Multiple Controls Regulate the Expression of <i>mobE</i> , an HNH Homing Endonuclease Gene Embedded within a Ribonucleotide Reductase Gene of Phage Aeh1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile genetic elements have the potential to influence the expression of genes surrounding their insertion site upon invasion of a genome. Here, we examine the transcriptional organization of a ribonucleotide reductase operon (nrd) that has been invaded by an HNH family homing endonuclease, mobE. In Aeromonas hydrophila phage Aeh1, mobE has inserted into the large-subunit gene (nrdA) of aerobic ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), splitting it into two smaller genes, nrdA-a and nrdA-b. This gene organization differs from that in phages T4, T6, RB2, RB3, RB15, and LZ7, where mobE is inserted in the nrdA-nrdB intergenic region. We present evidence that the expression of Aeh1 mobE is regulated by transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and translational controls. An Aeh1-specific late promoter drives expression of mobE, but strikingly the mobE transcript is processed internally at an RNase E-like site. We also identified a putative stem-loop structure upstream of mobE that sequesters the mobE ribosome binding site, presumably acting to down regulate MobE translation. Moreover, our transcriptional analyses indicate that the surrounding nrd genes of phage Aeh1 are expressed by a different strategy than are the corresponding phage T4 genes and that transcriptional readthrough is the only mechanism by which the promoterless Aeh1 nrdB gene is expressed. We suggest that the occurrence of multiple layers of control to limit the expression of mobE to late in the Aeh1 infection cycle is an adaptation of Aeh1 to reduce any effects on expression of the surrounding nrd genes early in phage infection when RNR function is critical.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".