MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121972531

Fitting membrane resistance in single cardiac myocytes reduces variability in parameters

2014· article· en· W2121972531 on OpenAlexaff
Jaspreet Kaur, Anders Nygren, Edward J. Vigmond

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in Cardiology Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiological systemMyocyteElectrophysiologyCardiac electrophysiologyComputer scienceCardiac cellFunction (biology)Experimental dataCardiac myocyteBiochemical engineeringBiophysicsNeuroscienceBiologyMathematicsEngineeringCell biologyStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mathematical models of single cardiac myocytes have a valuable role in driving progress in cardiac physiology and in exploring the electrophysiological mechanisms underlying heart function. Most of these models are used to mimic the results of experimentally observed biological phenomena measured in animal models, and can also provide quantitative insights into natural processes. Adjusting parameters in an ionic model to reproduce experimental behaviour is difficult. Mostly, researchers fit the only the net current to reproduce an action potential (AP) shape. However, even with an excellent AP match in the single cell, tissue behaviour can be vastly different. We hypothesize that this uncertainty can be reduced by additionally fitting R m .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing in Cardiology ConferenceSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207