MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121982806 · doi:10.1109/cnsr.2011.37

Towards QoS Assurance with Revenue Maximization of LTE Uplink Scheduling

2011· article· en· W2121982806 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuality of serviceComputer scienceTelecommunications linkComputer networkScheduling (production processes)MaximizationNetwork packetBandwidth allocationBandwidth (computing)Mathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Qos provision is considered as the complex task due to the heterogeneous nature, diverse QoS requirements of emergent different applications. With the advent of high bandwidth 3G/4G technologies, like LTE, LTE-advanced, the necessity of QoS provision becomes even crucial. Uplink scheduling with QoS provision is considered here. The contribution of this work is uplink packet scheduling scheme maintaining QoS provision at the granular level while maximizing the revenue of network operator. Proposed scheme is generalized for all kinds of traffic. In order to demonstrate the results, we limit the classifications of traffic to best effort, traffic with delay requirement and traffic with bandwidth requirement. Through extensive simulation, we have justified the effectiveness and strength of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207