Regards sur les pratiques critiques manifestées par des élèves du secondaire dans le cadre d’une réflexion éthique menée en îlot interdisciplinaire de rationalité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article discute des pratiques critiques manifestées par des élèves du secondaire observés à l’intérieur d’un îlot interdisciplinaire de rationalité portant sur le suicide assisté. Pour ce faire, l’auteur propose une définition de la pensée critique centrée sur l’idée de pratique, ainsi qu’une grille émergente d’analyse fondée sur des types d’interventions constitutives des pratiques critiques. Les résultats montrent que face à un problème éthique, les élèves mobilisent plusieurs des ces interventions. Cependant, il a été relevé que les pratiques critiques des élèves tendent à se modifier selon que leurs réflexions portent sur des propos émis par leurs pairs ou sur les savoirs considérés savants, scientifiques ou objectifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.032 | 0.050 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.056 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".