MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121990713 · doi:10.5539/jas.v6n6p155

Bio-Revegetation Impact on the Physicochemical Characteristics of a Sandy Quarry Soil in Terga Beach Region in Algeria

2014· article· en· W2121990713 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amina. A. Mouffak, Hassini Tsaki, Adelkader Bekki, Laid Krabia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAeolian processes and effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevegetationEnvironmental scienceCalcareousOrganic matterPhosphorusAgronomyBiologyChemistryEcologyBotanyLand reclamation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to define the impact of a bio-revegetation effect on soil physicochemical properties, we used Acacia Saligna in variants with bio-fertilizers such as rhizobia and mycorrhizae that play a key role in the productivity and sustainability of soil as well as the environmental protection. The area of study is a degraded sandy quarry in Terga, a coastal semi-arid area located in the northwestern part of Algerian. Our sampling and analysis of soil were made after each trimester of experiments in the fields, using four blocks, each one containing ten plots. Sampling is a composite of soil that was made in each plot diagonally on a depth of 10 cm and a diameter of 30 cm from the plant, at different times: first trimester (3 months), second (6 months), and third (9 months). Preliminary results showed a real and favorable modification of substrates by obtaining materials with less alkaline pH, there is a significant phosphorus increase in the second and third trimester compared to the first trimester, however the soil calcareous nature prevents the expression of some parameters resulting in a small improvement in total nitrogen and a deficiency in both exchangeable magnesium and organic matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicAeolian processes and effectsFrench-language works237,207