Analysis of Genetic Relationship Among 11 Iranian Ethnic Groups with Bayesian Multidimensional Scaling Using HLA Class II Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The key feature of Bayesian methods is their lack of dependence on defaults necessary for classical statistics. Because of the high volume of simulation, Bayesian methods have a high degree of accuracy. They are efficient in data mining and analyzing large volumes of data, and can be upgraded by entering new data. Objective: We used Bayesian multidimensional scaling (MDS) to analyze the genetic relationships among 11 Iranian ethnic groups based on HLA class II data. Method: Allele frequencies of three HLA loci from 816 unrelated individuals belonging to 11 Iranian ethnic groups were analyzed by Bayesian MDS using R and WinBUGS software. Results: like the results of correspondence analysis as a prototype of classical MDS analysis, the results of Bayesian MDS also showed Arabs from Famur, Balochis, Zoroastrians and Jews to be separate from other Iranian ethnic groups. Decreases stress in Bayesian MDS method compared to classical method revealed the accuracy of Bayesian MDS for HLA data analyses. Conclusion: This study reports the first application of Bayesian multidimensional scaling to HLA data analysis with Nei’s DA genetic distances. Stress reduction in Bayesian MDS compared to classical MDS showed that the Bayesian approach can improve the accuracy of genetic data analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".