MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122097463 · doi:10.2174/1389450054021864

Expression and Functions of Galectin-1 in Sensory and Motoneurons

2005· review· en· W2122097463 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew D. Gaudet, Jennifer K. E. Steeves, Wolfram Tetzlaff, Matt S. Ramer

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Drug Targets · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicGalectins and Cancer Biology
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair Discoveries
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensory systemGalectin-3NeuroscienceExpression (computer science)GalectinCell biologyBiologyComputer scienceImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Galectin-1 (Gal1) was the first identified member of the galectin family of beta-galactosidase-binding proteins. Gal1 has important roles in processes fundamental to growth and survival of an organism, including cell adhesion, cell proliferation and apoptosis, and is expressed in many tissues, including the nervous system. In the 1980s, research focused on the developmental regulation of Gal1 expression during neurogenesis. Gal1 was found to be expressed mainly in peripherally-projecting neurons beginning early in neurogenesis, and its expression is maintained at high levels in subpopulations of these neurons in the adult rodent. Although the expression pattern of Gal1 implied that it may be involved in axonal guidance or targeting of subsets of sensory and motoneurons, possible roles of Gal1 in the nervous system had not been confirmed until recently. Gal1 has since been shown to be required for the proper guidance of subsets of primary olfactory axons (to targets in the olfactory bulb) and of primary somatosensory axons (to targets in the superficial dorsal horn). In addition, Gal1 has been implicated in the regenerative response of axons following peripheral nerve injury. Gal1 has been shown to promote axonal regeneration through the activation of macrophages. Also, Gal1 may act within the injured neuron to enhance regrowth: the injury-induced regulation of Gal1 in numerous types of peripherally- and centrally-projecting neurons correlates positively with the regenerative potential of their axons. In this review, we discuss the expression pattern of Gal1 in sensory and motoneurons, and the potential roles of Gal1 in development, axonal regeneration and neuropathic pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Drug TargetsSame topicGalectins and Cancer BiologyFrench-language works237,207