MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122121618 · doi:10.1080/080370500439335

Candesartan in Heart Failure - Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) Study Programme

2000· article· en· W2122121618 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Pressure · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCandesartanMedicineHeart failureACE inhibitorInternal medicineCardiologyAngiotensin-converting enzymePopulationAngiotensin IIIntensive care medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heart failure is a major cause of death, hospital admissions and poor quality of life. It affects some 1-2% of the general population, increasing to up to 8% in people over 75 years of age. Although treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduces symptoms and mortality, 50-70% of patients with heart failure still die within 5 years of diagnosis. There is thus clear scope for improving the treatment of patients with this condition. The CHARM programme is designed to define the clinical benefits of the long-acting angiotensin II type 1 (AT 1 ) receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil, in a wide variety of patients with symptomatic heart failure. Candesartan cilexetil will be evaluated in three double-blind, randomized studies involving patients grouped according to left ventricular function and ACE inhibitor tolerance/intolerance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it