MétaCan
← all works

Accident or osteoporosis?: Survey of community follow-up after low-trauma fracture.

2011· article· en· 10 citations· W2122164535 on OpenAlex

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Survey of post-fracture osteoporosis management; the object is clinical care quality, not research practice.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

The study evaluates osteoporosis follow-up in patients, not research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Clinical survey of post-fracture osteoporosis care; object is patient management, not research practice.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the postfracture osteoporosis management of at-risk patients presenting with low-trauma fracture in a suburban community hospital setting. DESIGN: Telephone survey. SETTING: Hospital emergency department serving a retirement community in White Rock and South Surrey, BC. PARTICIPANTS: Men and women older than 40 years of age who presented with low-trauma fracture between October 1, 2004, and April 30, 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of bone mineral density testing, osteoporosis medication prescriptions, referrals to fall prevention programs, and calcium and vitamin D supplementation within 6 months of the index fracture, as well as patient perceptions of future risk of fracture and sources of osteoporosis information. RESULTS: A total of 181 people met the eligibility criteria and 161 were contacted; 84 (52%) people responded, of whom 53 were interviewed. At the time of their index fractures, 79% (42 of 53) of patients surveyed were not taking osteoporosis medication. After the index fracture, 30% (16 of 53) received new bone mineral density testing, and 8% (4 of 53) were starting courses of new osteoporosis medication. Sixty-eight percent (36 of 53) of all patients were taking calcium supplements and 50% (26 of 53) were taking vitamin D supplements. Eight percent (4 of 53) of patients were referred to a fall prevention program and 9% (5 of 53) were prescribed hip protectors; 19% (10 of 53) of patients thought they were at risk of having another fracture. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis management of patients after low-trauma fracture in this community was suboptimal; the role of the media, family and friends, and allied health professionals to prevent fractures in at-risk individuals needs to be further explored.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
PubMed
Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
Fraser Health
Funders
Keywords
MedicineOsteoporosisHip fractureTelephone interviewBone mineralVitamin D and neurologyPhysical therapyEmergency departmentMedical prescriptionPediatricsEmergency medicineInternal medicinePsychiatryNursing
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes