MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122183772 · doi:10.2514/1.1267

Thermal Spreading Resistance in Compound and Orthotropic Systems

2004· article· en· W2122183772 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicVacuum and Plasma Arcs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthotropic materialHeat fluxThermalFlux (metallurgy)Materials scienceThermal resistanceBoundary value problemMechanicsBoundary (topology)ThermodynamicsHeat transferMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisMetallurgyFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ar eview of thermal spreading resistances in compound and orthotropic systems is presented. Solutions for thermal spreading resistances in compound systems are reported. Solutions are reported for both cylindrical and rectangular systems, variable flux distributions, and edge cooling. Transformations of the governing equations and boundary conditions for orthotropic systems are discussed, and new solutions are obtained for rectangular flux channels and circular flux tubes. Nomenclature Ab = baseplate area, m 2 Am, An, Amn, Bn =F ourier coefficients As = heat source area, m 2 a, b

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it