MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122187984 · doi:10.7202/009297ar

Quand le passé n’est pas garant de l’avenir : aînées, pauvreté et activités physiques1

2004· article· fr· W2122187984 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Alex Dumas

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePolitical scienceGynecologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude traite de la pratique d’activités physiques chez les aînées de milieux moins bien nantis de Montréal. En s’inspirant du concept de « rupture biographique » de Bury (1982, 1991), elle consiste à voir dans quelle mesure la prise de conscience de la finitude du corps, en tant qu’élément-rupture, a une incidence sur l’adoption de pratiques d’activités physiques. L’analyse révèle que la période de la vieillesse engendre une rupture biographique qui se manifeste, notamment, par un souci accru pour les pratiques de santé préventive. Ces résultats combattent certains stéréotypes qui nuisent aux efforts de promotion de la santé menés auprès des aînées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207