MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122192165 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4353420

Hidden Markov Multivariate Autoregressive (HMM-mAR) Modeling Framework for Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Data

2007· article· en· W2122192165 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidden Markov modelAutoregressive modelElectromyographyMultivariate statisticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionMaximum-entropy Markov modelMarkov modelMarkov chainVariable-order Markov modelMachine learningStatisticsMathematicsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface electromyographic (sEMG) analysis is complicated by the fact that the data are inherently non-stationary. To deal with this and to determine muscle activity patterns during reaching movements, we proposed modeling sEMG with a hidden Markov model-multivariate autoregressive (HMM-mAR) framework. The classification between healthy and stroke subjects was performed using structural features extracted from HMM-mAR models. Both the raw and carrier data produced excellent classification performance. The proposed method represents a fundamental departure from most existing methods where only the amplitude is analyzed or the mAR coefficients are directly used for classification. In contrast, our analysis shows that structural features of the multivariate sEMG carrier data or the residuals after model fitting can enhance the classification of reaching movements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it