Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deuxième volet d’une étude consacrée à la possibilité et l’existence chez Leibniz, cet article tente de reconstruire la conception leibnizienne de l’existence, notion fondamentale qui soutient toute l’ontologie de l’auteur et qui n’est pourtant ni clairement définie ni systématisée. En trois parties, nous établissons que l’existence leibnizienne est bien un degré de possibilité, un ajout, un complément, mais elle n’ajoute rien de nouveau. Elle n’est pas une perfection, mais une relation comparative de perfections entre elles. Elle n’est pas un prédicat réel, mais un prédicat logique. Elle se définit comme ce qui est distinctement senti, ce qui plaît à un esprit tout en ne déplaisant pas à l’esprit le plus puissant, et ce qui est le plus harmonique. La conception leibnizienne de l’existence a plusieurs couches, et à de nombreux égards préfigure déjà la position kantienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".