MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122203423 · doi:10.1061/40792(173)196

International Perspective on BMPs/SUDS: UK — Sustainable Stormwater Management in the UK

2005· article· en· W2122203423 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLife Cycle Costing Analysis
Canadian institutionsAmerican Water (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatutory lawActivity-based costingStormwater managementPerspective (graphical)StormwaterVariety (cybernetics)Environmental planningSustainable developmentLife cycle costingBusinessEngineeringPolitical scienceConstruction engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceAccountingSurface runoffLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The philosophy behind sustainable drainage systems (SUDS) and the different techniques employed in the UK are briefly described. The role of a variety of organizations involved in the management of stormwater is explored along with the complex framework of administrative, legal and statutory issues which represent a barrier to further implementation of SUDS. A national initiative to find the way forward is outlined. The privatized status of the water industry in England and Wales and the role of the economic regulator have lead to an important research project resulting in the development of a whole life costing model for SUDS/BMPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLife Cycle Costing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207