MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122214136

Ecological Consequences Of Relatedness: The Role Of Competition And Herbivory In The Community Structure Of Co-Occurring Asteraceae

2010· dissertation· en· W2122214136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeCommons (Cornell University) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAndrew W. Mellon FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyCompetition (biology)EcologyBiomass (ecology)Intraspecific competitionSibling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Species interactions, such as competition and herbivory, are believed to be important structuring forces in plant communities. As a proxy for species similarity, the degree of relatedness among species may influence the intensity and outcomes of these interactions. In my dissertation research, I examined whether relatedness influenced the relative importance of plant competition and insect herbivory, and their feedbacks, in structuring the local community of closely related Asteraceae. Focusing on seven common, co-occurring, old-field species (genus Solidago, Symphyotrichum, and Euthamia), I tested the long-standing hypothesis that competition between close relatives is stronger than among more distantly related taxa. I also examined the effects of plant community structure on herbivory by a specialist outbreaking herbivore (Trirhabda virgata), and, in turn, the impacts of herbivory on plant competitive dynamics and community structure. Relatedness was not a reliable predictor of the intensity of competition among the focal species. Outcomes of pairwise competition between close and more distant relatives did not differ in a shortterm greenhouse experiment. Over three years, community productivity and growth of individual species were comparable in field mesocosms containing closely related species or mixtures of more distantly related taxa, in spite of clear differences in competitive abilities among species. However, communities of close relatives experienced greater invasion by other old-field species, highlighting the role of relatedness and competition in broader plant community structure. Community relatedness also determined the extent of damage by Trirhabda, which reflected the insect's host preference hierarchy. Specifically, the preferred genus (Solidago) suffered greater herbivory when growing in mixtures with the less preferred genus (Symphyotrichum) than when growing alone; the opposite pattern was observed for Symphyotrichum. In spite of differential damage, herbivory did not lead to a shift in the competitive abilities or community structure of the focal species compared to communities protected from herbivores; however, insect herbivores promoted invasion of the communities by other old-field species. In summary, my research reveals the consequences of species relatedness in trophic interactions between plants and herbivores, but not directly in plant competition, and underscores the potential feedbacks between plant community structure and herbivory over longer time scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it