MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dependence of horizontal stress magnitude on load dimension in glacial rebound models

2002· article· en· W2122267972 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Johnston, Patrick Wu, Kurt Lambeck

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersRijkswaterstaat
KeywordsGeologyIntraplate earthquakeDeglaciationLithospherePost-glacial reboundIce sheetMantle (geology)ViscoelasticityInstabilitySeismologyGeophysicsInviscid flowMechanicsGlacial periodTectonicsGeomorphologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been proposed that the deglaciation of the Northern Hemisphere triggered large earthquakes within intraplate environments and in this paper we examine this hypothesis by evaluating quantitatively the stress state in the lithosphere produced by time-dependent surface loads. A series of models demonstrate the dependence of horizontal incremental stress in an elastic plate overlying an inviscid or viscoelastic mantle on the lateral extent of a load applied at the surface. The horizontal stress is largest when the dominant wavelength (that is twice the diameter) of the load is close to eight times the elastic thickness of the plate when the mantle is inviscid and, for the particular viscosity model employed in this paper, close to 12 times the elastic thickness for a viscoelastic mantle. At wavelengths close to the critical wavelength, the horizontal incremental stress may be up to six times as large as the vertical incremental stress. For appropriate earth-model parameters amplification of horizontal stress is close to maximum for ice loads with a radius of 280 km, comparable to the dimensions of the former ice sheet over Great Britain. This amplification may be sufficiently large that loading by small ice sheets can lead to failure on marginally stable faults, in contrast to the behaviour for large ice sheets. The models also predict greater fault instability for Fennoscandia than for the larger Laurentide ice sheet, consistent with the observation of large postglacial faults in northern Sweden. The model is used to predict the stability of faults and style of faulting due to rebound stresses in the absence of a background tectonic stress field since the last glacial maximum (∼ 18 000 years ago) in Northern Europe. Within the formerly glaciated region thrust faulting is predicted to occur at the end of deglaciation and normal faulting is predicted to occur in peripheral regions for the entire period since the last glacial maximum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207