MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122270925 · doi:10.1149/05321.0015ecst

Passivation in Non-Random Solid-Solution Alloys

2013· article· en· W2122270925 on OpenAlexaff
Dorota Artymowicz, K. Sieradzki

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivationContext (archaeology)Percolation (cognitive psychology)Percolation thresholdMaterials scienceMixing (physics)Atom (system on chip)Monte Carlo methodCondensed matter physicsStatistical physicsThermodynamicsPhysicsNanotechnologyElectrical resistivity and conductivityQuantum mechanicsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results from large-cell Monte Carlo renormalization group calculations for the effects of ordering and clustering on site percolation thresholds in bcc alloys are presented. The results demonstrate that for the case of relatively small positive heats of mixing (0.015 eV/atom), the site percolation threshold is lowered from its conventional value of ~0.25 to 0.16. Conversely, for a small negative heat of mixing (-0.015 eV/atom), the threshold increases to ~0.30. The implications of these results on corrosion/passivation in the context of the integrity of materials for nuclear power systems are indicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207