MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122304193 · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000323

Patient-centred communication: a sophisticated procedure

2011· letter· en· W2122304193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Quality & Safety · 2011
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVerbal autopsySlumPopulationCohortPublic healthEnvironmental healthDiseaseCohort studyCause of deathPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) is of growing importance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there are conflicting views regarding CVD as a major public health problem for the urban poor, including those living in slums. We examined multivariable risk prediction in a slum population and assessed the number of cardiovascular related deaths within 10 years of application of the tool. <h3>Methods</h3> We analysed data from a cross sectional survey conducted in the Nairobi Urban Health Demographic Surveillance population (residents of two slum communities) between May 2008 and April 2009. We used the World Health Organisation/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) cardiovascular risk prediction tool to examine 10-year risk of major CVD events in a slum population. 3063 men and women aged over 40 years with complete data for variables needed for the WHO/ISH risk prediction tool were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. CVD deaths in the cohort, reported up until June 2018 in regular demographic data collection rounds, with the cause identified through verbal autopsy are also presented. Non-fatal CVD events were not captured. <h3>Results</h3> The majority of study members (2895, 94.5%) were predicted to have ‘low’ risk (&lt;10%) of a cardiovascular event over the next 10 years and just 51 (1.7%) to have ‘high’ CVD risk (≥20%). 91 CVD deaths were reported for the cohort up until June 2018. Of individuals classified as low risk, 74 (2.6%) were identified as having died of CVD. Nine (7.7%) of individuals classified at 10–20% risk and eight (15.9%) classified at &gt;20% were identified as dying of CVD. <h3>Discussion</h3> To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to apply a multivariable risk prediction tool to a population in a slum or informal settlement. This is a low risk population profile in comparison to results from application of multivariable risk prediction tools in other LMIC populations. This indicates that CVD may be lesser issue in slums than in other areas of LMICs cities. We found evidence that the WHO/ISH tool distinguished groups at relatively lower or higher risk of CVD events. While the absolute risk in this population is over-estimated by the tool, this may be due to limitations in our study such as lack of data on non-fatal CVD events. Our findings have implications for health service planning in similar settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.376
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.085 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it