MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122324699 · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2013.73

Peak Valley Edge Patterns: A New Descriptor for Biomedical Image Indexing and Retrieval

2013· article· en· W2122324699 on OpenAlexaff
Subrahmanyam Murala, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocal binary patternsSearch engine indexingArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceImage retrievalEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Computer visionRegion of interestHistogram

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new algorithm meant for biomedical image retrieval application is presented in this paper. The local region of image is represented by peak valley edge patterns (PVEP), which are calculated by the first-order derivatives in 0°, 45°, 90° and 135° directions. The PVEP differs from the existing local binary pattern (LBP) in a manner that it extracts the directional edge information based on first-order derivative in an image. Further, the effectiveness of our algorithm is confirmed by combining it with Gabor transform. The performance of the proposed method is tested on VIA/I-ELCAP database which includes region of interest computer tomography (ROI-CT) images. Performance analysis shows that the proposed method improves retrieval results from 79.21% to 86.13% and 51.91% to 55.06% as compared to LBP in terms of average precision when number of top matches considered is 10 and 100 respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207