MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122324699 · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2013.73

Peak Valley Edge Patterns: A New Descriptor for Biomedical Image Indexing and Retrieval

2013· article· en· W2122324699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocal binary patternsSearch engine indexingArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceImage retrievalEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Computer visionRegion of interestHistogram

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new algorithm meant for biomedical image retrieval application is presented in this paper. The local region of image is represented by peak valley edge patterns (PVEP), which are calculated by the first-order derivatives in 0°, 45°, 90° and 135° directions. The PVEP differs from the existing local binary pattern (LBP) in a manner that it extracts the directional edge information based on first-order derivative in an image. Further, the effectiveness of our algorithm is confirmed by combining it with Gabor transform. The performance of the proposed method is tested on VIA/I-ELCAP database which includes region of interest computer tomography (ROI-CT) images. Performance analysis shows that the proposed method improves retrieval results from 79.21% to 86.13% and 51.91% to 55.06% as compared to LBP in terms of average precision when number of top matches considered is 10 and 100 respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it