MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122330571 · doi:10.1080/00401706.2015.1133457

Variable Selection in a Log–Linear Birnbaum–Saunders Regression Model for High-Dimensional Survival Data via the Elastic-Net and Stochastic EM

2016· article· en· W2122330571 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnometrics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElastic net regularizationFeature selectionAccelerated failure time modelMathematicsVariable (mathematics)StatisticsSelection (genetic algorithm)Regression analysisAlgorithmLinear regressionRegressionComputer scienceMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsSurvival analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution is broadly used to model failure times in reliability and survival analysis. In this article, we propose a simultaneous parameter estimation and variable selection procedure in a log–linear BS regression model for high-dimensional survival data. To deal with censored survival data, we iteratively run a combination of the stochastic EM algorithm (SEM) and variable selection procedure to generate pseudo-complete data and select variables until convergence. Treating pseudo-complete data as uncensored data via SEM makes it possible to incorporate iterative penalized least squares and simplify computation. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method using simulated and real datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it