MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122331539 · doi:10.1071/aseg2015ab179

Geophysical Responses over the Cannington Ag-Zn-Pb Deposit-Queensland

2015· article· en· W2122331539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsCondor Petroleum (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGradiometerGeologyBoreholeDrillingCover (algebra)Mining engineeringMagnetometerEngineeringMagnetic fieldMetallurgyMaterials sciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cannington deposit is a high grade Ag-Zn-Pb deposit found in 1990 by BHP Minerals drilling an isolated 1,000 nT aeromagnetic feature. Following the discovery of Cannington, numerous airborne, ground and borehole surveys have been carried out which overall, provided some assistance at better defining the ore system but did not lead to the discovery of new major deposit in the area.While Cannington possessed a clear magnetic response, the presence of a thick conductive cover made the use of EM and electrical techniques challenging. BHP used Cannington as a test ground for a variety of new techniques including a ground SQUID EM sensor, modified airborne EM technology (higher power and lower base frequency) and over 10 years after discovery, the first ever Falcon airborne gravity gradiometer survey in Australia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it