MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122338812 · doi:10.1017/s1049023x12001707

Minimum Data Set for Mass-Gatherings Health Research and Evaluation: A Response

2013· letter· en· W2122338812 on OpenAlexaff
Sheila A. Turris, Adam Lund

Bibliographic record

VenuePrehospital and Disaster Medicine · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTravel-related health issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContent (measure theory)Computer scienceSet (abstract data type)Action (physics)Information retrievalMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors argued that in order to advance the science of mass-gathering health (MGH), researchers and clinicians ought to employ a similar approach to data collection, using standardized conceptual definitions and uniform classifications for the illnesses and injuries that occur in the setting of mass gatherings (MGs). In essence, Ranse and Hutton argued for the creation of a ''minimum data set'' (MDS) or a standardized set of variables that would be of interest with regard to every mass-gathering event, regardless of country, event category, or event type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.410
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.078 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrehospital and Disaster MedicineSame topicTravel-related health issuesFrench-language works237,207