Flowing ability of self-consolidating concrete and its binder paste and mortar components incorporating rice husk ash
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the flowing abilities of various self-consolidating concretes (SCCs) and their binder paste and mortar components. The binder pastes and mortars were formulated from the concrete mixtures and tested for flowing ability with respect to flow time and flow spread, respectively, at various dosages of high-range water reducing admixture (HRWRA). The concrete mixtures were prepared with different water (W) to binder (B) ratios and rice husk ash (RHA) contents. The flowing ability of the concretes was measured with regard to slump flow, orimet flow time and flow spread, and inverted slump cone flow time and flow spread. The test results reveal that the W:B ratio, RHA content, and HRWRA dosage significantly influenced the flowing abilities of the binder pastes, mortars, and concretes. In addition, the flowing ability of the SCCs was well correlated with the flowing abilities of their binder paste and mortar components, except for the mortars including RHA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".