Improved Prediction of HIV‐1 Coreceptor Usage with Sequence Information from the Second Hypervariable Loop of gp120
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‐1) uses the CD4 receptor and a coreceptor to gain cell entry. Coreceptor usage is mainly determined by the V3 loop of gp120. Therefore, coreceptor usage is currently inferred from the genotype on the basis of V3 alone. However, several mutations outside V3 have been repeatedly reported to influence coreceptor usage. In this study, the impact of the V2 loop on coreceptor usage prediction was analyzed. METHODS: Sequences were analyzed for differences at specific positions and position‐independent features with the Fisher exact and Student t tests. Prediction models were trained with support vector machines and evaluated in cross‐validation on clonal data. Models trained on the clonal data set were validated on 2 clinical data sets. RESULTS: Several mutations and position‐independent features within V2 were statistically significantly different between R5 and X4 viruses. Cross‐validation on the clonal data set revealed a statistically significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve if features of both loops were used, compared with those using only V2 or V3 alone. Similar results were found with clinically derived data sets. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of the V2 loop to improve coreceptor usage prediction has been shown in a large data set. Utilization of this information can lead to considerable improvements in the prediction of coreceptor use both on clonal data sets and on clinically derived data sets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".