Neural network EM-Field based modeling for 3d substructure in finite element method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most existing neural network (NN) approaches for modeling EM problems are based on training with the S-parameter at the external input-output ports of the EM structures. In this paper we present a new method to describe EM behavior at the internal interface between decomposed 3D substructures. We train NNs to represent the EM behavior of the substructure as seen from the interface. This approach allows EM coupling effect between substructures to be better represented. The method is developed in the finite element method (FEM) environment. EM transfer function matrix is formulated to produce training data to allow the NN to learn the coupling between EM field variables at various locations across the entire interface of the 3D substructure. A new formulation allowing trained NN models to be connected with FEM equations of other substructures for efficient simulation of the overall EM structure is proposed. Examples of waveguide circuit simulations show that the proposed method provides better accuracy and efficiency over the conventional neural network method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it