MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122486043 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1996.548235

Real-time update of a frequency dependant admittance matrix [power systems]

2002· article· en· W2122486043 on OpenAlexaff
Miloud Mihoubi, Michel Lavoie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicScientific Research and Discoveries
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdmittance parametersComputer scienceAdmittanceMatrix (chemical analysis)AlgorithmPower (physics)VoltageElectrical impedanceElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network components are nonlinear devices and their impedance values vary with frequency, voltage and power variations. Tracking of these parameters and subsequent update tasks are mainly CPU intensive. Accuracy expected from modern digital simulators imposes frequent updates of the various admittance values. Real-time digital simulators impose the new challenge of performing these updates on large matrix at best in HRT (hard real-time) (every step) and at worst in near real-time (every few steps). HRT is achieved when the computations are performed as fast as the phenomena unfolds, in this case 60 Hz. The authors have focused on this problem and more specifically on the frequency dependency. They have examined various algorithms and developed an implementation strategy that allows real-time frequency compensation of large network admittance matrices. Their algorithm consists in representing each circuit element by its frequency dependent quadrupole model and the corresponding q-matrix. These q-matrices are combined to produce the network elements equivalent c-matrices. Finally, the c-matrices are used to compute the updated admittance matrix elements and update the network nodal matrix. Their strategy consists in isolating the q-matrix and c-matrix formation from the admittance matrix update. In this fashion, the algorithm can be easily implemented on a parallel architecture and thus achieve HRT. The algorithm, the models and the strategy have been implemented on a two serial and one parallel computers using the C programming language. In this paper, the authors present their results as applied to a single-phase balanced power network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScientific Research and DiscoveriesFrench-language works237,207