MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122520867 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2009.5425802

Relay Based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks

2009· article· en· W2122520867 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioRelayRayleigh fadingComputer scienceFalse alarmFadingDetectorComputer networkCognitive networkRelay channelCognitionWirelessTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)Artificial intelligencePower (physics)PsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we exploit cooperative spectrum sensing technique for applications in a relay based cognitive radio network. Relays are assigned in cognitive radio networks to transmit the primary user's signal to a cognitive coordinator. This research is focused on the detection of primary user in single or multiple cognitive relay scenarios. The performance of energy detector is analyzed for independent Rayleigh fading channels. False alarm and detection probabilities are derived theoretically with or without direct communication between the primary user and the cognitive coordinator. An upper bound is also given for detection probability. Our analysis is validated by numerical and simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it