Developmental expression patterns of four chemosensory protein genes from the Eastern spruce budworm, <i>Chroistoneura fumiferana</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chemosensory proteins (CSPs) are associated with insect sensory organs, including the sensillum lymph in some cases. However, they are also commonly expressed in nonsensory tissues that lack gustatory and olfactory neurones. We characterized the sex and development specific expression patterns of four CSP genes from the Eastern spruce budworm (ESB) using Northern blots. CfumAY426540.2 was detected at high levels in adult moths. Conversely, CfumAY426538 was expressed in all stages except adult moths, and was most abundant during late stages of the 6th instar. CfumAY701858 was expressed in all stages, while CfumAY426539 was detected less frequently, at specific developmental stages such as the 5th to 6th instar moult. During a natural moult, and a premature moult induced by the ecdysteroid agonist tebufenozide, CfumAY701858 and CfumAY426539 were up-regulated, while CfumAY426538 appeared to be down-regulated. Our results suggest that some members of the CSP gene family from the ESB may be involved in development, including moulting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".