MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122574060 · doi:10.1109/mnano.2008.931481

Surface plasmon nanophotonics: A tutorial

2008· article· en· W2122574060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Nanotechnology Magazine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanophotonicsSurface plasmon polaritonSurface plasmonPlasmonNanolithographySurface plasmon resonanceLocalized surface plasmonOptoelectronicsOpticsMaterials sciencePolaritonNear-field scanning optical microscopeNanotechnologyPhysicsNanoparticleOptical microscope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this tutorial is to give a practical introduction to surface plasmon nanophotonics. Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) are introduced as a waveguide mode at a single interface. It is shown how SPPs in nanostructures can both concentrate the local field intensity and shorten the optical wavelength. Localised surface plasmons (LSPs) are introduced and described using the quasi-static approximation. It is shown how LSPs lead to local field enhancement, which may be further cascaded to achieve additional enhancement. A brief discussion of six application areas of surface plasmon nanophotonics is given: surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensing, SERS, enhanced fluorescence, nonlinear optics, nanolithography and sub-wavelength imaging, and optical trapping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it