MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122578154 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2007.380189

Electromagnetic Scattering From Multiple Arbitrary Shape Grooves: A Generalized Formulation

2007· article· en· W2122578154 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Sujeet K. Chaudhuri, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium digest · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHFSSNear and far fieldGroove (engineering)ScatteringIsosceles triangleField (mathematics)HarmonicsOpticsElectromagnetic fieldFourier transformGeometryMathematicsPlane (geometry)Mathematical analysisPhysicsReflection (computer programming)Materials scienceAntenna (radio)EngineeringComputer scienceTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the first time, analytical-based solution of scattering from multiple general-shaped groove in a perfectly conducting plane is presented. The formulation, for the near as well as far-field, is based on Fourier-integral representation of the scattered field and stair-case approximation of the groove field. The near and far-field results for the special case of six rectangular grooves are compared with those obtained from HFSS and previously published results. New results for the near-and far-field of nine isosceles right triangle grooves are also presented. It was noticed that the number of groove layers and retained unknown harmonics coefficients of the groove field has significant effect on the near-field and little effect on the far-field calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium digestSame topicOptical Coatings and GratingsFrench-language works237,207