MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122582020 · doi:10.1071/sr05195

Improved measurement of conductivity on swelling clay soils using a modified disc permeameter method

2006· article· en· W2122582020 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
FundersGrains Research and Development CorporationCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
KeywordsPermeameterHydraulic conductivitySoil waterInfiltration (HVAC)Soil scienceSoil healthWettingFlow (mathematics)ConductivityGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceSoil organic matterEnvironmental scienceChemistryGeologyMathematicsComposite materialGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disc permeameters are the preferred method for measuring unsaturated hydraulic conductivity (Kψ) in situ. However, in swelling clays, Kψ measured using 3-D measurement and analysis methods are often several orders of magnitude too high and are of no value for modelling internal drainage. During a series of experiments, the causes of inflated Kψ values were identified and a modified method developed to accurately measure Kψ. On a Black Vertosol, Kψ was strongly correlated with water content and measurement period, with higher flow rates occurring until the soil profile had fully wet up. Near-saturated Kψ measured under permeameters was up to 2 orders of magnitude higher than field-saturated conductivity (KFS) measured in ponded rings. This discrepancy was caused by residual capillarity and unrestricted swelling at the wetting front in unsaturated soils. In addition, lateral flow was common and surface depressions around permeameters filled with water, erroneously contributing to measured infiltration and invalidating assumptions in the 3-D analysis. To prevent this, permeameters were confined within rings to restrict flow to 1D, and measured Kψ (confined) was then compared with Kψ (unconfined) and KFS (ponded rings). Confining flow to 1D reduced Kψ by up to 2 orders of magnitude for a Black Vertosol and by a factor of 3 for a Red Ferrosol. Near-saturated Kψ from confined permeameters agreed well with KFS after similar short measurement durations (e.g. 0.5 h), but Kψ was still overestimated until steady-state flow was established. Therefore, to derive estimates of Kψ that reflect natural flow during internal drainage, we recommend (i) pre-wetting the soil and extending measurement time to attain steady-state flow, and (ii) confining permeameters within rings to restrict flow to 1 dimension. This method was used to compare lucerne ley and annual cropping treatments on 2 Black Vertosols (Bongeen and Waco). Kψ was similar between cropping treatments, suggesting that initial differences in structure and porosity were transient and related to soil moisture content. The Bongeen soil had a significantly lower Kψ (K–1 cm of 0.8 mm/h) than the Waco soil (2.0 mm/h).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it