MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122661534 · doi:10.1109/nafips.2004.1337412

Experimental results of an adaptive fuzzy network Kalman filtering integration for low cost navigation applications

2004· article· en· W2122661534 on OpenAlexafffund
T. Abdelazim, W. Abdel-Hamid, Naser El‐Sheimy, Eun-Hwan Shin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsKalman filterFast Kalman filterComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemInertial measurement unitFuzzy logicControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringExtended Kalman filterSIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of Kalman filter is highly dependent on the availability of two basic requirements: (1) accurate dynamic modeling and (2) proper measurements that fit this model. The absence of either of those two requirements will degrade the Kalman performance over time particularly during the absence of the reference signal frequently used to update the estimated Kalman states. To overcome such problem, a new design model, namely fuzzy-Kalman, integrating fuzzy logic systems and adaptive Kalman filtering for the integration of IMU and GPS is developed in this paper. The developed model was tested using an integrated GPS/IMU for land-vehicle navigation applications. The results indicated that, unlike traditional Kalman, the proposed fuzzy-Kalman model could efficiently bridge short-time outages of reference signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04.Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207