Juvenile capelin (Mallotus villosus) off Newfoundland and Labrador in the 1990s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Juvenile capelin, Mallotus villosus (Müller), were distributed primarily on the northern Grand Banks and secondarily along the northeast coast of Newfoundland during late summer, 1994–1999. In some years, distributions extended to coastal Labrador. Capelin were seldom observed over deep water of the northeast Newfoundland Shelf or in shallow water of the southern Grand Banks. There were large areas encompassing wide ranges of capelin densities measured by the IYGPT trawl where the acoustic system did not detect capelin. Mean growth rate of capelin from 0- to 2-group was represented by length (mm)=90.9 age (years) 0.57 (r 2 =99%). The 1-group capelin formed discrete schools that varied significantly in fish length from 65 to 110 mm (p<0.05). Spatially, the different size groups occurred at scales of <55 km and possibly <3 km in some cases. The geographic distribution of age groups was not a simple function of cohort abundance. Capelin were distributed primarily in the middle ranges of temperature (5–8°C) and zooplankton biomass (2–4 g dry weight m −2 ) sampled during the surveys. It is possible that interspecific competition limits the distributions of juvenile capelin, where juvenile Arctic cod ( Boreogadus saida ) and sandlance ( Ammodytes sp.) were abundant to the north and south respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".