Variation stylistique des autoportraits et adaptation de l’enfant à l'école primaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude examine les relations entre les styles d'autoportrait, l'autoévaluation des compétences et l'évaluation de l'adaptation scolaire par les pairs et l'enseignant. L'étude porte sur 81 enfants scolarisés dans un établissement d'enseignement primaire de Toulouse. Trois styles d'autoportrait ressortent : les autoportraits élaboré, expressif et minimaliste. Les deux premiers ne semblent pas associés à des problèmes d'adaptation, mais les enfants liés au style minimaliste manifestent un faible score sur l'autoévaluation des compétences sociales et scolaires, et une faible estime de soi. Les professeurs les perçoivent comme plus dérangeants et les pairs les évaluent comme affichant davantage de comportements antisociaux. Le fait qu'une autoévaluation négative soit associée à un autoportrait minimaliste et aux attributions de comportements antisociaux suggère que ces enfants éprouveraient éventuellement des difficultés d'adaptation scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".