Preparation and Characterization of Superhydrophobic Modification of Polyvinylidene Fluoride Membrane by Dip-Coating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The superhydrophobicity polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes were modified via reducing surface energy by dip-coating perfluoroalkyl methacrylic copolymer (Zonyl 8740) onto the membranes prepared on mat glass. The chemical component of the unmodified and modified PVDF membranes surface was investigated by ATR-FTIR. Morphology and hydrophobicity of the unmodified and modified PVDF membranes were examined by scanning electronic microscopy and water contact angle, respectively. The effects of concentration of Zonyl 8740, coating time, conditions of heat treatment on hydrophobic capability of PVDF membranes were investigated. The results showed that the water contact angle increased from 141˚ to 151˚ by the dip-coating modification, therefore getting superhydrophobic PVDF membrane. Moreover, the porosity and the morphology of modified PVDF membrane were unchanged by the dip-coating modification. This results suggested that the hydrophobicty stability of the modified PVDF membrane was also good.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".