MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122736352 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3873

DEVELOPING PARTNERSHIPS WITH THE FIRE SERVICE TO ENHANCE FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES

2011· article· en· W2122736352 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
David A. Torvi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire dynamics and safety research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsFire protectionFire protection engineeringService (business)Architectural engineeringProcess (computing)EngineeringEngineering design processEngineering managementBusinessCivil engineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fire protection engineering is increasing in importance in Canada and other countries, especially with recent changes to building and fire codes. Fire protection engineering design is highly interdisciplinary, which can present challenges when developing courses in this area. At the University of Saskatchewan, this challenge has been partially addressed through partnerships with the fire service, and other universities and research organizations. This paper discusses the importance of considering the fire service in the design process, and provides examples of partnerships with the fire service in the Mechanical Engineering undergraduate program and in graduate research projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicFire dynamics and safety researchFrench-language works237,207