MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122748526 · doi:10.4161/rna.8.2.15196

Nidovirus ribonucleases: Structures and functions in viral replication

2011· review· en· W2122748526 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRNA Biology · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyExoribonucleaseGeneticsGenomeRNAPolymeraseRNA-dependent RNA polymeraseDNAGeneRNase P

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nidoviruses employ unique strategies to replicate and express their exceptionally large RNA genomes. The viruses use a variety of enzymes to synthesize, modify and process an extensive set of viral RNAs of both genome and subgenome length, including RNA polymerase, primase, helicase, ribose 2'-O and guanosine-N7 methyltransferases and several types of nuclease activities. In this review, the recent progress in the structural and functional characterization of nidovirus nuclease activities is discussed, focusing on a nidovirus-wide conserved uridylate-specific endoribonuclease, NendoU, and a 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease called ExoN. The latter enzyme is related to members of the DEDD exoribonuclease superfamily and conserved in all nidovirus families with genome sizes approaching 30 kilobases. Recent evidence implicates ExoN in reduced mutation rates during viral RNA replication and, possibly, superior fidelity of nidovirus replicases, leading to the suggestion that ExoN may be a key factor in the expansion of nidovirus genomes to sizes not seen in other RNA viruses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it