MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122823116 · doi:10.1109/crv.2012.35

Gaussian Process Gauss-Newton: Non-Parametric State Estimation

2012· article· en· W2122823116 on OpenAlexaff
Chi Hay Tong, Paul Furgale, Timothy D. Barfoot

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaussian processParametric statisticsCovarianceGaussian functionMathematical optimizationKernel (algebra)GaussNewton's methodApplied mathematicsGaussianMathematicsBasis functionState (computer science)Computer scienceAlgorithmNonlinear systemMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present Gaussian Process Gauss-Newton (GPGN), an algorithm for non-parametric, continuous-time, nonlinear, batch state estimation. This work adapts the methods of Gaussian Process regression to the problem of batch state estimation by using the Gauss-Newton method. In particular, we formulate the estimation problem with a continuous-time state model, along with the more conventional discrete-time measurements. Our derivation utilizes a basis function approach, but through algebraic manipulations, returns to a non-parametric form by replacing the basis functions with covariance functions (i.e., the kernel trick). The algorithm is validated through hardware-based experiments utilizing the well-understood problem of 2D rover localization using a known map as an illustrative example, and is compared to the traditional discrete-time batch Gauss-Newton approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceFrench-language works237,207