MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122823240 · doi:10.1504/ijids.2014.061771

Distributed constraint satisfaction with multiply sectioned constraint networks

2014· article· en· W2122823240 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Xiang, Younis Mohamed, Wanling Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Information and Decision Sciences · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstraint satisfaction problemConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer scienceConstraint satisfactionTree (set theory)Mathematical optimizationLocal consistencyConstraint satisfaction dual problemExponential functionAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new algorithmic framework, multiply sectioned constraint networks (MSCNs), for solving distributed constraint satisfaction problems (DisCSPs) with complex local problems. An MSCN is converted into a linked junction forest (LJF) and is solved by a complete algorithm. Its time complexity is linear on the number and size of local problems (each in charge by an agent) and is exponential on cluster size of LJF. We show that the MSCN-LJF algorithm is more efficient than junction tree-based DisCSP algorithms. When a DisCSP is not naturally an MSCN, we show how to convert it into an MSCN, so that any DisCSP can be solved as above.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Information and Decision SciencesSame topicConstraint Satisfaction and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207