MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122829595 · doi:10.5539/ass.v10n22p263

Emotional Experiences of Person as a Reason of Psychosomatic Risk Origin

2014· article· en· W2122829595 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Galina I. Efremova, Galina Valentinovna Timoshenko, Elena Anatolievna Leonenko, Irina Aleksandrovna Bochkovskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyEmotional stressPsychosomatic medicinePsychotherapistMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is focused on issues of psychological conditions for complex research of psychosomatic disorders risk. It investigates level of a scientific development of significant categories of a longstanding uncompensated stress and emotional experiences causing it. Here is described necessary model of development of theoretical grounds of psychological research that investigates the reasons of risk of various psychosomatic disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicTechnology and Human Factors in Education and HealthFrench-language works237,207