MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122836938 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1997.608306

An edge-enhanced segmentation method for SAR images

2002· article· en· W2122836938 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Ju, Cecilia Moloney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarSpeckle noiseSpeckle patternMultiplicative noiseArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionRadar imagingFilter (signal processing)Image segmentationSegmentationNoise (video)Median filterInverse synthetic aperture radarImage processingRadarImage (mathematics)TelecommunicationsTransmission (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major problem in processing synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images is the presence of speckle noise which is multiplicative in the sense that the noise level increases with the magnitude of radar backscattering. Past researchers have proposed filtering schemes for removing speckle based on local statistics. However, these usually do not use edge information in their analysis. In this paper, an edge-enhanced local mean and median filter is proposed to smooth SAR speckle noise while preserving edges. Based on the iterative application of this filter, an unsupervised segmentation scheme is provided to divide a SAR image into homogeneous regions with respect to gray level intensity. The simplicity and efficiency of this scheme are demonstrated by application to airborne SAR images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207