MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122839730 · doi:10.1002/anie.200901719

The Challenge of Atropisomerism in Drug Discovery

2009· review· en· W2122839730 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Clayden, Wesley J. Moran, Paul Edwards, Steven R. LaPlante

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAxial and Atropisomeric Chirality Synthesis
Canadian institutionsBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsAtropisomerDrug discoveryDrugConformational isomerismChemistryComputational biologyNanotechnologyStereochemistryMedicinePharmacologyMaterials scienceBiologyOrganic chemistryBiochemistryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A twist in the tale: Recent reports have highlighted solutions to the problems encountered when drug candidates exist as slowly interconverting conformers or atropisomers (see scheme). This Minireview brings together the various strategies that have been adopted and proposes a general approach to handling an aspect of stereochemistry which has received little attention from drug regulatory agencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations767
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicAxial and Atropisomeric Chirality SynthesisFrench-language works237,207