MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122906415 · doi:10.1109/icm.2000.916464

Investigation of Fermi-profile tapered slot integrated antennas

2002· article· en· W2122906415 on OpenAlexaff
N. Hojjat, S. Yarasi, S. Safavi‐Naeini, T. Manku

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaperingSlot antennaAntenna (radio)Radiation patternOpticsPhysicsElectrical impedanceBalunFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeAcousticsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fermi profile for tapered slot integrated antenna is a kind of tapering profile which has greater degrees of freedom for antenna design. We introduce two new Fermi-like profiles and compare their radiation patterns to Fermi tapering. It is shown that when the slot widens at the beginning of the taper, the E-plane HPBW becomes narrower and the H-plane HPBW becomes wider. On the other hand, when the slot mainly opens at the end of the taper E-plane HPBW becomes wider and H-plane HPBW becomes narrower. For the E-plane pattern, experimental results are obtained and are in good agreement with theoretical ones. A CPW triangular impedance transformer combined with an in-line transition to slot-line with radial balun is applied for feeding the antenna. This antenna is intended for use in an integrated circuit mm-wave receiver for wireless communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207