Hydrothermal Processes and Mineral Systems.: FRANCO PIRAJNO. Pp. 1250. 2009. Springer, Berlin, Germany. ISBN 978-1-4020-8612-0, e-ISBN 978-1-4020-8613-7. Price US$259.00 (hardcover).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book reviews hydrothermal mineral deposits and related processes, as implied by the title. However, it also includes an introduction to a potpourri of topics, from hydrothermal principles and fluids, hydrothermal alteration, and tectonic settings of mineral deposits, through description of several styles of mineral deposits, to the relationships between hydrothermal systems and the biosphere, as well as information on meteorite impacts and the search for extraterrestrial life, ending with a “brief panoramic on uranium mineral systems.” The discussion of mineral deposits, or “mineral systems,” as is preferred by Pirajno to imply a more extensive and inclusive environment, includes intrusion-related, porphyry and epithermal, skarn, submarine, sedimentary rock-hosted stratiform and strata bound, and orogenic, amagmatic, and deposits of an uncertain origin. These chapters are, in part, updates from a 1992 treatise by Pirajno …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.104 | 0.077 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".