MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122968084 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.155

A Self-X Approach for OLSR Routing Protocol in Large-Scale Wireless Mesh Networks

2008· article· en· W2122968084 on OpenAlexaff
Azzedine Boukerche, Lucas Guardalben, João Bosco Mangueira Sobral, Mirela Sechi Moretti Annoni Notare

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless mesh networkComputer networkHazy Sighted Link State Routing ProtocolOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolOrder One Network ProtocolAd hoc wireless distribution serviceDistributed computingRouting protocolWireless ad hoc networkWireless Routing ProtocolWireless networkMesh networkingNetwork packetMobile ad hoc networkThroughputLink-state routing protocolWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless mesh networks constitute an emerging technology that is quickly gaining popularity due to its countless advantages in terms of coverage area and low implementation cost. Wireless mesh networks are also capable of self- organization. The eminent advantage of a self-organized network is its ability to perform network control and management, which reduces both the developmental complexity and the need for maintenance of these networks. In this paper, we propose a self-organizing approach for the optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR) in wireless mesh networks, based on the agent technology. Based on the results we obtained, we argue that our architectural self-organization model increases throughput and improves the delay and packet delivery of the overall network, when compared to the original OLSR protocol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207