MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122994664 · doi:10.2753/imh0020-7411360105

Sterilization of the Mentally Ill During the Years of World War II in Finland

2007· article· en· W2122994664 on OpenAlexaff
Mary V. Seeman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mental Health · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEugenicsMentally illSterilization (economics)Nazi GermanyNazismWorld War IIFirst world warLawPolitical sciencePsychiatryMedicineHistoryAncient historyMental healthMental illnessPoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A eugenic sterilization law was passed in Finland in 1935, and it was replaced by a harsher one, postwar, in 1950. Most sterilizations designated as eugenic were carried out after the war, when Finland was no longer allied with Germany. In contrast to most other countries, the events in Nazi Germany did not deter the passage of the 1950 law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mental HealthSame topicMedical History and ResearchFrench-language works237,207