MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123003403 · doi:10.1109/cdc.1991.261779

Maneuvering target tracking using jump processes

2002· article· en· W2123003403 on OpenAlexaff
Sang Seok Lim, M. Farooq

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJump processFilter (signal processing)White noiseJumpMonte Carlo methodApplied mathematicsNoise (video)MathematicsComputer scienceKalman filterSequence (biology)Stochastic differential equationPoisson distributionStochastic processControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmStatisticsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present a maneuvering target model with the maneuver dynamics modeled as a jump process of Poisson type. The jump process represents the deterministic maneuver (or pilot commands) and is described by a stochastic differential equation driven by a Poisson process taking values from a set of discrete states. Assuming that the observations are governed by a linear difference equation driven by a white Gaussian noise sequence, the authors have developed a linear, recursive, unbiased minimum variance filter. The performance of the proposed filter is assessed through a numerical example via Monte Carlo simulations. It is observed from the numerical results that the proposed filter provides good estimates for rapidly maneuvering targets.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207