MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123034520 · doi:10.3190/jgeosci.056

The question of water content in parsonsite: a model case - occurrence at the Červené žíly vein system, Jáchymov (St. Joachimsthal), Czech Republic

2010· article· en· W2123034520 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jakub Plášil, Jiřı́ Čejka, J. Sejkora, Pavel Škácha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geosciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMasarykova UniverzitaUniversity of AlbertaPřírodovědecká Fakulta, Univerzita KarlovaUniverzita Karlova v Praze
KeywordsInfrared spectroscopyElectron microprobeCrystal structureThermogravimetric analysisCrystal (programming language)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Hydrogen bondBond lengthMoleculeCrystallographyMineralogyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strongly altered gangue, containing rich crystalline aggregates of parsonsite, was recently found at the outcrop parts of the Červené žíly vein system, the Jáchymov ore district, Czech Republic.Mineralogical research proved that in the crystal structure of parsonsite from Jáchymov is present a higher content of molecular water than expected.This conclusion is supported by the results of thermogravimetric analysis and infrared spectroscopy.The weight loss obtained from TG curve is 3.70 wt.%, corresponding to 1.93 mols of H 2 O.The presence of a broad vibration band reflecting the O-H stretching vibrations of molecular water was ascertained in the infrared spectrum of studied parsonsite sample, suggesting that H 2 O molecules are involved in the hydrogen-bonding network in the crystal structure of studied parsonsite.Inferred hydrogen bond lengths can vary in the range 2.6-3.0Å, which is consistent with the distance between possible position of the molecular water and nearest neighbouring oxygen atom in the crystal structure of the synthetic parsonsite given in the literature.The chemical composition of the studied parsonsite from Jáchymov, 47.27 PbO, 13.38 P 2 O 5 , 1.60 As 2 O 5 , 0.16 SiO 2 , 32.61 UO 3 , 3.70 H 2 O, total 98.71 wt.%, can be expressed as Pb 1.99 (UO 2 ) 1.07 [(PO 4 ) 1.77 (AsO 4 ) 0.13 (SiO 4 ) 0.03 ] Σ1.93 .1.93 H 2 O, based on electron microprobe and thermal analyses.Its refined unit-cell parameters for triclinic space group P-1, a 6.860(2), b 10.404(3), c 6.665(3) Å, α 101.46(3)O, β 98.30(3) o , γ 86.29(2) o , V 461.0(3)Å 3 agree very well with the published data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of GeosciencesSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207