MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123036754 · doi:10.1109/aps.1989.134760

Studies on input impedance and coupling of a dual polarized two port microstrip antenna

2003· article· en· W2123036754 on OpenAlexaff
K. V. Rao, P. Bhartia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDepartment of National DefenceUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostripPort (circuit theory)Microstrip antennaElectrical impedanceCoupling (piping)Dual (grammatical number)Patch antennaPolarization (electrochemistry)PhysicsSquare (algebra)Topology (electrical circuits)Image impedanceDual-polarization interferometryPoint (geometry)Antenna (radio)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceOpticsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematicsGeometryMechanical engineeringStanding wave ratioChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiport analysis with a cavity model is used to investigate the dual-port, dual-polarized microstrip patch. Using the equations derived, the normalized driving point impedance and the coupling are determined for a square patch with a feed port located at the center of one side. From the results presented it is clear that for dual polarization the coupling port should be located exactly in the middle of the orthogonal side of the square. This gives the minimum coupling for the other port location. The results obtained using the analysis are compared with the experimental results available in the literature and are found to be in good agreement with theory.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207