MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123054575 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2007.906399

Reduced-Complexity Time-Domain Equalization for Turbo-MIMO Systems

2007· article· en· W2123054575 on OpenAlexaff
Y.L.C. de Jong, T.J. Willink

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersymbol interferenceComputer scienceQuadrature amplitude modulationMIMOAlgorithmTurboEqualization (audio)Trellis (graph)QAMTurbo codeTrellis modulationElectronic engineeringMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Bit error rateFadingTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A reduced-complexity time-domain equalization scheme for wideband turbo-multiple-input multiple-output (turbo-MIMO) systems is presented. This scheme, called iterative trellis search equalization, is based on a modified version of the M-Bahl-Cocke-Jelinek-Raviv (M-BCJR) algorithm, applied to a suitably chosen trellis representation of the wideband MIMO channel process. Exploiting the properties of quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) signal constellations with block-partitionable labels, this modified M-BCJR algorithm has complexity per bit that is independent of the constellation size, and polynomial in the number of transmit antennas and channel memory. Results from computer simulations show that the new scheme successfully mitigates intersymbol interference even if only a very small fraction of trellis state transitions is considered. It is also demonstrated that asynchronous transmission of the spatially multiplexed symbol streams can result in considerable performance improvement compared to synchronous MIMO systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207